A Child's Cry... 02/28/2011
 
Picture
When I was about six years old in South Africa, Dad had to be taken to Johannesburg for an operation on one of his legs and Mum went with him, taking our little brother with her. We had a nanny, our beloved Harriet, a black girl ('grown up' to us, of course) who loved us as if we were her own. But caring for us 24/7 on her own was not possible. This left me and my twin brother needing care. We were put into a children's home for about a six weeks. On our first night in this place, one of the other children knelt on her bed and repeatedly chanted, "You'll be here forever, you won't ever see your Mummy and Daddy again - not ever, ever, ever!" My mind went into a spin, shocked and uncomprehending. I tried to settle down on the thin mattress, so unlike my real bed at home, with her words filling my head.

The next morning I woke up and was mortified to discover I had doubly fouled my bed. It was the same the next morning and the next and the next... and so on. I feared waking up each morning with a soaking wet bed and the sensation of dried feces cracking apart between my buttocks. "No, nooo," I pleaded, burying my head in my pillow, "please, please no!" I was ashamed. I was bad.

Initially I was cared for with a detached, matter of fact manner: bathed, dressed and left to live each day with all the other children. I felt imprisoned (I still recall the high walls that surrounded the tiny playground). Finally, one 'carer' lost her patience. I was dragged to the showers, scrubbed with a floor brush and... this is hard to retell... genitally abused. My foreskin had not naturally retracted. Suffice to say, she took violent exception to that - and saw opportunity to punish me more. I saw blood wash away in the water. My memory of anything that ensued after that terrible morning is lost - except this:

We were eventually taken back home... and to this day, I remember in vivid detail the moment I saw my mother standing, waiting at the front door. I ran down the long path, crying out in joy, "Mummy, Mummy, Mummy!" And fell into her open arms, sobbing uncontrollably, released from that little girl's lies and the terror I had lived through.

Picture

Roll forward many years: grown man and married. My foreskin had lost its elasticity at the site of the injury and was painful to attempt retraction. So any masturbation, alone, or with my wife's assistance, was done with the glans covered. But sexual intercourse, with her natural lubrication, helped to ease the skin over the 'head' and back again - and often made the experience very special, as nature intended. I bless the fact that we had our three children this way.

There were a few frightening occasions when my foreskin stayed retracted, leaving the glans exposed and unbearably sensitive to touch.

Inevitably though, there came a point when even penetrative sex was no help - until one night when I withdrew with my foreskin totally trapped behind the coronal rim. Nothing I or my wife did to try to release it was successful. It began to swell with engorged blood, I was in great pain. My wife rang 999. I was rushed to hospital. I remember an incision to release the edema. Two days later, I was circumcised, accompanied in the hospital by my eldest daughter - a newly qualified nurse at the time - who was my rock through it all. This was in March 2002.
 
The circumcision itself was painless; so much so that when one of the attending nurses asked, "Did you feel that?" I replied, "No - not a thing. "Just as well," she retorted, "you'd have kicked him!" Does any baby boy ever receive a local anesthetic as effective as that? I think not, because it's used at that strength for adults whose metabolism can accept it. Moreover, babies fortunate to receive even a milder injection of anesthesia will feel the pain of the needle in the base of their penis. I received two on either side and it hurts. But I was an adult undergoing a necessary circumcision: big difference.
 
The recovery period was not painless, nor is it for an infant boy. Initially, the now permanently exposed glans is excruciatingly sensitive to the slightest touch of a finger or light brush of clothing, not to mention the sutures at the site of the removed foreskin which ooze drops of blood and stick to clothing. The sensation I speak of is not erotic in any way; it's similar to the pain when we knock our humerus (funny bone), but made more intense because it's a sexual organ. A rather foolish piece of advice I read from a list of do's and dont's after the surgery was to avoid erections, as if we somehow have any control with this - and did the compiler of the list not consider 'morning wood'? I also had to visit my local hospital outpatient department with an infection of the wound. It was cleared up with an antibiotic, but it still meant yet another examination. Not every man or boy goes through complications like mine. Many do.
 
However, there is one absolutely inevitable consequence of circumcision: increasing loss of sensitivity as the years go by. Imagine this from boyhood, let alone from a mere nine years ago as in my case (almost to the day). Nature designs the penis perfectly: the glans as an internal organ within its protective sheath which is filled with nerve endings designed to interact in a shared partnership of exquisite sensual pleasure. Cut off its sheath and nature goes into a desperate attempt to simulate its protective foreskin. It grows a covering of toughened tissue, incrementally as the months and years pass by. Nature doesn't 'think' of sexual compromise, it simply protects an injury - and the penis is finally left a shadow of its former self.
 
My glans is now unable to detect heat from cold: both are equally neutral under very hot or icy water. The only sense I have is of pressure. It was a shocking discovery for me. Yet guiding the flow of water onto my shaft made me recoil.
 
Sex? I can masturbate and ejaculate, of course. But it was a learning curve in the absence of a foreskin (I won't go into detail, publicly). With a foreskin it is natural and so very easy. Sexual intercourse? Not good - for her or me. It takes me so much longer to achieve climax... and she is sore before I ejaculate and is left in a state of "Just lie back and think of England," as she puts it. It distresses her AND me. We rarely try anymore.
 
I'm aware that most American adults, men and their partners, have lived with circumcision for many years and learned to enjoy sex, regardless. But I do wonder if they ever give a thought to the ultimate pleasure of natural sex. I once had that pleasure.
 
Nature gives every boy his birthright - together with the equal right of every girl who is now protected from genital mutilation, almost worldwide. Boys are no longer 'fair game', to put it brutally. Even American routine circumcision of its boys has dropped suddenly and fast in the last year.
 
It was a different world when I was a small boy.
Picture
Christopher S. shares his story in hopes that others will embrace genital integrity.  Not only does his story show the harm in forceful retraction, but the undeniable fact that there is a big difference with and without a foreskin. Please, do not take this away from your son(s). His body, his choice.
 


Comments

02/28/2011 12:00pm

My heart truly goes out to this man. Abuse perpetuates abuse. I'm simply appalled that he was prematurely retracted as a form of punishment though it's not the first time I've heard this. In American culture, male genital mutilation is more or less a form of religious and social entrapment.

Thank you so much Christopher for sharing your story.

-Rachel A. Weisberger-

Reply
02/28/2011 1:38pm

A slight vertical incision on the scar tissue with a lateral suture would have eased his "problem" without a "necessary 'circumcision'." Does Christopher realise this, or was he given no option? I have arthritis in my elbow, but does that warrant amputation of my arm? However, I appreciate his harrowing story and we need more like him to share.

Reply
roger desmoulins
02/28/2011 4:40pm

The bizarre obsessions of the English speaking peoples with the tip of the penis, especially in boyhood, has created several generations of walking wounded. The post above is a very well written case in point. I have met another member of the walking wounded face to face.

I was forcibly retracted by a doctor when I was 7. My foreskin had already completely detached from the glans. I did not experience real pain, and I have no reason to believe I was damaged. But this should not have happened.

Reply
Christopher
02/28/2011 9:40pm

Rachel, thank you for your understanding. 'Entrapment' is a perfect term to descibe MGM, whether unrightfully as a boy with his natural penis or even necessarily in adulthood after abuse as a child. Once done there is no escape from its consequences.

Reply
Christopher
02/28/2011 10:19pm

Gerald, a dorsal incision was made to release the oedema (I used the US spelling: edema); I'm sure I mentioned this.
The result was not only cosmetically unpleasing (think about it) but I was told it would compromise future sexual activity. I was in no state to debate the matter. I had no option. I was circumcised.

Reply
Christopher
02/28/2011 10:52pm

Roger, thank you for your interesting reply.
When I was in boarding school in England, we had annual medical examinations. Part of this involved testicle manipulation (to search for problems) AND prepuce retraction - which was the first time my parents were made aware of my damaged foreskin.
Perhaps your doctor was simply doing what he was expected to do? Though at the age of 7 it does seem inappropriate.

Reply
Heather James
03/01/2011 2:19pm

Thank you for sharing your story. It's horrific what was done to you as a child. I'm so sorry to hear that, and I'm sorry for the consequences of it in your adult life. Have you thought of foreskin restoration? It won't be exactly like the original but perhaps better than what you've got now. Good luck.

Reply
Fred Rhodes
03/01/2011 6:02pm

Christopher, I've used foreskin restoring expansion devices (for us excised guys) since 2001 with great results. I've read that men with tight foreskins have adopted these devices with 100% success and there are devices on the market now. I take it no one was around to give you any stretching advice either?

Reply
Christopher
03/02/2011 7:20pm

Heather and Fred... yes, I have thought about restoration, but frankly it isn't something I wish to put myself through.
If I didn't know what it's like to have a real foreskin then I might feel differently. Restoring uses shaft skin, with none of the foreskin's fine touch receptors.
But I thank you both for caring enough to suggest it.

Reply
Mithras
03/04/2011 11:17pm

Hi Christopher: I had a similar situation when our family doctor tried to force retract me when I was six.
Of course, no six year old's foreskin will retact as it is still connected to the glans by synechia. When I screamed in pain, he turned to my mother and said I needed to be circumcised.
She was never one to question a doctor and give him permission right away. I did not understand what was happening, but knew it was not going to be good.
He began to cut right away, without the benefit of pain reduction.
Of course, this brutally cruel and unnecessary procedure has made me a firm intactivist, promoting foreskin restoration, and opposing non consentual circumcision in all cases.
I am happy you have taken the time to write your story, for the purpose of educating everyone about the harm that circumcision causes.
Mithras

Reply
Christopher
03/20/2011 10:39pm

Mithras - hello.
IMC in the USA was a tragedy suffered by boys for far too long... my heart is deeply saddened for them. You were a victim of 'normalcy'. Parents honestly believed it was in their sons' best interests and somehow managed to accept the pain they suffered as a short-lived necessity to 'correct' nature's apparent inabilty to make the foreskin extinct. It was "excess tissue" - a phrase often used by American doctors when circumcising a penis. The phrase makes me mentally recoil.
But isn't it remarkable and wonderful that the US routine circumcision rate has suddenly plunged to around 30%?
This blog is not the place to discuss it - but 'The WHOLE Network' is!
Little American boys will grow up as nature made them, with never a need to think about foreskin restoration!
Christopher

Reply
03/29/2011 9:13pm

The article is worth reading, I like it very much. I will keep your new articles.

Reply
Christopher
05/06/2011 6:51pm

Red Bull Hats,
Thank you for you kind comment. However - and I could be wrong - it's my understanding that articles published under The Active Intactivist are by invitation only. I was asked to do so after I replied to a blog entitled 'Laying it All Out There' (see the list, top right of this page).
Christopher

Reply
PunkinheadDeluxe
05/10/2011 9:45am

Christopher, thank you for sharing your story. My heart is breaking for you and every boy who is forced to undergo childhood genital violence. It's so important that we educate our caregivers about the dangers of forced retraction and the possible cause of so many Americans 'needing' circumcision later in life.

Reply
Christopher
05/11/2011 7:55pm

PunkinheadDeluxe, I have replied to you (as a long-time friend) on BabyCenter's 'Questioning Circumcision & Raising Intact Boys'.
I'm pleased to promote that website, just as I do The WHOLE Network at every opportunity. And of course, American boys are no different to any other newly born boy.
The stark difference is later when he is older and American caregivers have the audacity to manipulate an intact boy's still-fused foreskin in ignorance and a perceived belief that it MUST retract. The child is painfully injured, leaving him scarred and - as you said - 'needing' circumcision as proof of its professed danger and inherent uselessness.
In reality he is left with a crippled penis... for life.

Reply
Callie
05/11/2011 9:01pm

Thank you so much for your article Christopher. I feel terrible for what you've lost, but I appreciate that you are willing to share your experiences. As an American, I've had very little exposure to intactivism until about 3 years ago, when I started hearing more and more of my friends were keeping their babies intact. I set out to discover why, and Im so glad I did. I have a precious 8 month old son, and we've protected his right to be intact. So many would take it from him and I would defend it with life and limb. Neither my husband or I have any experience with intact sexual issues, but your story makes me feel unbelievably happy that he has a chance at something so special that was denied to my husband and me. Thank you for sharing!

Reply
05/12/2011 10:05am

Thank you for sharing this very important story. I have a very good friend who was also genitally abused but fortunately older than you and not as much damage was done. I'm so sorry you experienced this. Not only do we have to educate parents to not circumcise, but we also have to teach them not to retract. Too many ignorant American doctors are telling parents to retract their baby boys.

Reply
Christopher
05/13/2011 7:12pm

Callie and Intactivist:

Callie, how lovingly and delightfully you speak of your son and his perfect little body. It sent a tingle down my spine. He is blessed by his parents' caring conviction.

Intactivist, it's the medical fraternity who *should* be their nation's teachers in all medical anatomy issues. "Education is the discovery of our own ignorance." Was ever a platitude more evident and important?

Reply
10/12/2011 9:34am

Christopher, you were a great influence to me on the BBC circ debate boards back in 2004 and 2005 leading up to my son's birth. Six years later and pregnant with my 3rd child, I can't help but to continue to do for others what you did for me despite ridicule and at the risk of losing friends who are unable to approach this topic with the maturity and care every parent should have wrt their children's health and human rights.

This is the first time I have actually read your story and I am so sorry for all you have been through. At the same time, I am so thankful for your willingness to speak out and educate moms like me who would have otherwise just gone with the flow. You have made a difference!

Reply
Christopher
11/06/2011 9:24pm

Tammy - hello! First I must tell you how I have never understood why BabyCenter members use the acronym 'BBC', when 'BC' seems much more accurate. 'BBC' means British Broadcasting Corporation to me!

Seriously now... thank you so much for your comments. Happily, circumcision debate boards are in their death throes for want of pro-circ participants.

Do you know the sex of your 3rd child? If it's a girl she will live to accept boys as nature made them. If a boy he will accept girls exactly the same. Shared genital integrity - how wonderfully perfect that is!

Reply
03/31/2012 6:01am

Great information posted in this blog. Keep up your work..

Reply



Leave a Reply